Research Stay at Dartmouth College

This spring, the Methods Lab student assistant, Diana Ignatovich, spent four months at Dartmouth college to research octopus cognition and visual processing.

Hidden in the New England wilderness is an underground laboratory housing three male Octopus bimaculoides that were shipped from the Pacific Ocean for non-invasive study using underwater electroencephalography (EEG). One of the octopuses was named Joseph—after the Weizenbaum Institute’s namesake, computer scientist Joseph Weizenbaum.

Rather than euthanizing the octopus or holding its tentacles down to understand its incredibly complex and decentralized nervous system, the underwater EEG apparatus used here is methodologically unique, to ensure no octopuses were harmed. This method records the brain’s electrical activity by detecting signals from groups of neurons, which are amplified by the EEG machine and studied as brain waves. To record this data, the experimental tank consisted of a clear plastic cube with two printed circuit boards on top and bottom, lined with tripolar concentric ring electrodes and submerged in saltwater. The tanks were also enriched with toys to encourage cognitive stimulation, and all experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

The primary project for this stay was in assessing the neural critical flicker fusion frequency (CFF) of the octopus via steady-state visual evoked potentials of the EEG power spectrum. The CFF threshold refers to the point at which a rapidly flickering light is perceived as steady, which indicates the speed of visual information processing in the brain. This gives insight for neural and visual processing efficiency as well as cognitive functions such as attentional control and overall responsiveness to changing environments. It is also commonly measured in psychophysics via behavioral paradigms, where a participant indicates the observed flicker fusion. However, since Joseph could not tell us about this boundary, the threshold was marked by a drop in EEG signal amplitude as flicker perception diminished. These experiments, performed using LED light at different brightness levels, were then repeated with human testing for comparison, to determine whether octopuses are better adapted to low-light conditions due to their underwater habitat.

The octopuses demonstrated higher critical flicker fusion frequency thresholds compared to humans, likely due to their evolutionary history and environmental conditions, where quick visual responses are necessary to spot prey or avoid predators.

It’s extraordinary that octopuses, despite lacking the rod and cone photoreceptor cells found in most eyes, have adapted to match or even exceed the critical flicker fusion thresholds of creatures like humans. These results are an exciting glimpse into the diversity and complexity of how other species experience their own vastly different worlds in nature.

Mobile methods panel at ICA 2025

Every year, the International Communication Association (ICA) organizes a conference where communication scholars from around the globe present and discuss their current research. In June 2025, the conference took place in Denver, USA, and many Weizenbaum Institute researchers contributed to it. Among others, Methods Lab member Roland Toth, together with colleague Jakob Ohme, former fellow Joseph Bayer (Ohio State University), and his team members Razieh Pourafshari and Yifei Lu, organized a conference panel called “Miss the Mobile Methods Turn? Reflecting on the Challenges and Potentials of Mobile Communication Science”.

Many social scientists use mobile data collection methods, such as the Ecological Momentary Assessment, data donations, or event log data, but there are hardly any standards or guidelines to work with. The panel addressed this lack of standardization and accessibility of mobile methods within and outside of communication science. In the introduction to the panel, the issue was outlined and attendees were asked to complete a short survey about their expertise regarding different mobile methods, problems they recognized, and whether and to what extent they are willing to contribute to future initiatives to improve the situation.

After the introduction, experienced mobile communication scholars presented examples of empirical research that highlight current practices, challenges, and future perspectives associated with mobile methods. Following these short talks, the presenters, attendees, and organizers discussed possible standards, priorities, and endeavors to strengthen this growing research area, as well as how the community can organize to support the use of mobile methods to the Communication field at-large.

The panel was received well and paved the way for further steps to gradually tackle these issues. The discussion shed light on the wide interdisciplinary use of mobile methods and their relevance, both in and beyond communication science, that goes along with that. It showed that there currently is potential for all panel presenters, attendees, and organizers, but also other communication researchers, to contribute to the advancement of mobile methods across fields, which the Weizenbaum Institute aims to participate in. Accordingly, based on the results of the survey, future initiatives such as white papers, methods reviews, or workshops addressing the current state and standardization of mobile methods will be planned. Stay tuned for these in the future!

Short Project: Ethics of Data Work

AI systems rely heavily on workers who face precarious conditions. Data work, clickwork, and crowdwork—essential for validating algorithms and creating datasets to train and refine AI systems—are frequently outsourced by commercial entities and academic institutions. Despite the vast and growing workforce of 435 million data workers enabling machine learning, their working conditions remain largely unaddressed, resulting in exploitative practices. Academic clients, in particular, lack clear guidance on how to outsource data work ethically and responsibly.

To address this issue, Christian Strippel from the Methods Lab is part of the short project “Ethics of Data Work” together with Milagros Miceli and Tianling Yang from the research group “Data, Algorithmic Systems and Ethics“, Bianca Herlo and Corinna Canali from the research “Design, Diversity and New Commons“, and Alexandra Keiner from the research group “Norm Setting and Decision Processes“. Together they aim to create equitable working systems grounded in the real knowledge and experience of data workers. The project will gather valuable insights about the challenges and needs data workers face, with the objective of developing ethical guidelines for researchers to ensure responsible and ethical treatment in the future.